The Weekend
Feb. 12th, 2010 04:31 pmBusy week. Lots of running around. I'm preparing for the Mardi Gras party Tuesday and Lori did the sweetest thing, she paid for the order I'd placed for the hurricane mix, the Zatarain's and Tony Chachere gumbos and red beans and rice, and the geaux cups. She paid for the whole order, and originally we were just going to split it--so sweet! She saved me much $$$ which is great because I really can't afford the party this year (starving student and all) but it's a tradition that I have to keep up!
So this weekend I will be shopping (mostly for King Cake supplies and sausage to put in the red beans and rice, and yeah and lots of rum for the hurricanes), cleaning the apartment, and STUDYING. Those Romans did QUITE a bit--it is not that easy keeping track of all their exploits. THREE Punic Wars and FOUR Macedonian Wars--and the Macedonian Wars started during the Punic Wars! Guys, can't you just get along? If the Cullens and the Quileute wolves can make a treaty, so can you.
Since we're getting narratives from several different sources (the three textbooks--one didactic textbook, and two with all original sources), plus our heavily-accented professor, plus our TA discussions, plus the powerpoint slides that I print out, I have a lot of notes and paperwork to put together. I've found it's immensely helpful to synthesize all of this into one master timeline. Not only is it easier to read, just the fact of creating it forces me to think clearly and linearly about the subject. I also do outside research--the professor and the textbook are not always terribly clear so it helps to get the information from another angle. For instance, a lot of these place names have several different names in different languages. When Hamilcar Barcid (father of Hannibal) went to Spain in the financially disastrous wake of the 1st Punic War, there were three main cities that he either founded or dealt with, and one is called Gades/Gadeira, etc. I came across several different variations on this name--on a hunch, and knowing that Cadiz is one of the oldest cities on the subcontinent (I know Cadiz well since our ship went there), I looked up Cadiz and found that its Phoenician name was Gadir, and that its Attic Greek name was Gádeira. Bingo! I just like to know the context, it helps me understand everything else that much better.
Hannibal is pretty cool. Elephants marching across the Alps! But I then I think about the elephants dying in battle and I get sad. Did you know that after the Battle of Lake Tresimeno, a notoriously bloody battle, "in the surroundings...there are further areas which retain a particular meaning, including Ossaia ('Charnel House, Place of Bones'), Sepoltaglia ('Place of Burial'), Caporosso ('Cape red'), Piegaro ('Subdued Place'), Pugnano ('Place of battles'), and Pian di Marte ('Field of Mars')"?
So this weekend I will be shopping (mostly for King Cake supplies and sausage to put in the red beans and rice, and yeah and lots of rum for the hurricanes), cleaning the apartment, and STUDYING. Those Romans did QUITE a bit--it is not that easy keeping track of all their exploits. THREE Punic Wars and FOUR Macedonian Wars--and the Macedonian Wars started during the Punic Wars! Guys, can't you just get along? If the Cullens and the Quileute wolves can make a treaty, so can you.
Since we're getting narratives from several different sources (the three textbooks--one didactic textbook, and two with all original sources), plus our heavily-accented professor, plus our TA discussions, plus the powerpoint slides that I print out, I have a lot of notes and paperwork to put together. I've found it's immensely helpful to synthesize all of this into one master timeline. Not only is it easier to read, just the fact of creating it forces me to think clearly and linearly about the subject. I also do outside research--the professor and the textbook are not always terribly clear so it helps to get the information from another angle. For instance, a lot of these place names have several different names in different languages. When Hamilcar Barcid (father of Hannibal) went to Spain in the financially disastrous wake of the 1st Punic War, there were three main cities that he either founded or dealt with, and one is called Gades/Gadeira, etc. I came across several different variations on this name--on a hunch, and knowing that Cadiz is one of the oldest cities on the subcontinent (I know Cadiz well since our ship went there), I looked up Cadiz and found that its Phoenician name was Gadir, and that its Attic Greek name was Gádeira. Bingo! I just like to know the context, it helps me understand everything else that much better.
Hannibal is pretty cool. Elephants marching across the Alps! But I then I think about the elephants dying in battle and I get sad. Did you know that after the Battle of Lake Tresimeno, a notoriously bloody battle, "in the surroundings...there are further areas which retain a particular meaning, including Ossaia ('Charnel House, Place of Bones'), Sepoltaglia ('Place of Burial'), Caporosso ('Cape red'), Piegaro ('Subdued Place'), Pugnano ('Place of battles'), and Pian di Marte ('Field of Mars')"?
(no subject)
Feb. 8th, 2010 12:48 amEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!
Who Dat Nation rejoices!!!!! New Orleans is on the rise again! Oh, next Tuesday is gonna be MAJOR at my place!!!! Pre-pare to PARTY!! Did y'all see that shot of Bourbon Street with that writhing drunken celebratory mass of humanity? The drought is OVER!
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS, SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS!!!!!

Who Dat Nation rejoices!!!!! New Orleans is on the rise again! Oh, next Tuesday is gonna be MAJOR at my place!!!! Pre-pare to PARTY!! Did y'all see that shot of Bourbon Street with that writhing drunken celebratory mass of humanity? The drought is OVER!

GOD HATES SIGNS
Feb. 4th, 2010 06:38 pm(Stolen from
mollyx)
At the risk of hyperbole, this is possibly one of the funniest things I've ever seen (although still not quite as good as the compilation video where all the TV journalists get hammered. Ohio State!).
The W*stb*r* B*pt*st "Church" showed up in San Francisco to protest...something. Oh right, Fiddler On the Roof. So someone had the brilliant idea to meet confront insane, poisonous, pointless hatred with absurdism.
GOD HATES SIGNS.
I have literally been laughing all day at this. Riding the 1 back from class this afternoon, I burst into giggles again. I think my favorite is I WAS PROMISED DONUTS. The rickrolling of God is also hilarious:
GOD
NEVER GONNA
GIVE YOU UP
GOD
NEVER GONNA
LET YOU DOWN
...and so forth. So, so funny.

If you'd like a more interactive experience you can generate one yourself at God Hates Signs. Here's mine:

At the risk of hyperbole, this is possibly one of the funniest things I've ever seen (although still not quite as good as the compilation video where all the TV journalists get hammered. Ohio State!).
The W*stb*r* B*pt*st "Church" showed up in San Francisco to protest...something. Oh right, Fiddler On the Roof. So someone had the brilliant idea to meet confront insane, poisonous, pointless hatred with absurdism.
GOD HATES SIGNS.
I have literally been laughing all day at this. Riding the 1 back from class this afternoon, I burst into giggles again. I think my favorite is I WAS PROMISED DONUTS. The rickrolling of God is also hilarious:
GOD
NEVER GONNA
GIVE YOU UP
GOD
NEVER GONNA
LET YOU DOWN
...and so forth. So, so funny.
If you'd like a more interactive experience you can generate one yourself at God Hates Signs. Here's mine:
Thoughts on Wicked
Feb. 4th, 2010 04:13 pmSo I finished Wicked a few days ago. Um...hmmm. Color me somewhat underwhelmed. I love the premise, and the weird, carnival-mirror version of Oz is a great idea and fun to explore. But I do not find Elphaba a satisfactory protagonist. It took me a little while to figure out why and it's this--she doesn't do that much, and what little she does do is never carried to its dramatic conclusion. In college she carries on Dr. Dillamond's research--does this go anywhere? Other than teaching Chister how to mimic, not really. In the Emerald City she does one fully realized thing--she has the affair with Fyero (I guess you could say she falls in love, allows herself to be vulnerable). But the dramatic conclusion to that, the apology to Sarima--piddles off into nowhere. She lives there for years and never apologizes and makes her own peace with what she did--yes, I realize that Sarima wouldn't let her but you have to develop that, you have to raise the stakes. If she couldn't do the thing that brought her to the Vinkus, why did she live there for so many years then? Did her feelings change then, did she somehow come to terms with what she did? You can't just have her plop down and then not raise the tension, develop it further. Getting back to her time in the Emerald City, she most noticeably doesn't do something--she fails to kill Madame Morrible. Of course later on she does--or does she? He tries to make it a big mystery--did she or didn't she kill Morrible at the end--but her pathetically bragging about it, while still unsure of what she actually did, just undermined the whole thing and I didn't care in the end. I shouldn't feel that way about the protagonist confronting a major villain.
She really doesn't do much magic at all, and doesn't seem very devoted to or even interested in its practice or study. In fact other than Animal rights, I'm not sure what she stood for.
The lack of decisive action is really noticeable when Dorothy enters the picture. All she does is track her and wait for her! She doesn't do SHIT to confront her, stop her, talk to her--that whole subplot was a major disappointment. I found myself much more interested in Dorothy than in Elphaba. (I will say, I thought the whole section where she sends the dogs, the crows and the bees gripping--like her destiny was inevitably approaching. Of course this was helped by everyone's knowing how the Witch ends up.)
She's really not a terribly likable or admirable character, IMO. Maguire's elliptical writing style doesn't help that much--sure, Baum was WAY in the other direction as a writer (but of course he wrote for kids), rarely did Baum write anything particularly witty or clever. But Maguire seems to be opaque for the sake of being opaque. It's kind of annoying, there's no payoff. Why did Morrible enchant the three girls and why didn't they end up carrying out her plans? What was the point of the Philosophy Club sequence and how did it affect the participants? Why did her friendship with Glinda peter out? And why am I supposed to care about Sarima and her sisters and the children?
Although reading the synopsis of the musical--wow. They really DID change a lot! It's interesting, at first I thought "why the hell did Maguire allow that?" then I thought "well, they aren't his characters to begin with!" I did think the aftermath of the Witch's murder was beautifully depicted, and it's a shame that was changed.
She really doesn't do much magic at all, and doesn't seem very devoted to or even interested in its practice or study. In fact other than Animal rights, I'm not sure what she stood for.
The lack of decisive action is really noticeable when Dorothy enters the picture. All she does is track her and wait for her! She doesn't do SHIT to confront her, stop her, talk to her--that whole subplot was a major disappointment. I found myself much more interested in Dorothy than in Elphaba. (I will say, I thought the whole section where she sends the dogs, the crows and the bees gripping--like her destiny was inevitably approaching. Of course this was helped by everyone's knowing how the Witch ends up.)
She's really not a terribly likable or admirable character, IMO. Maguire's elliptical writing style doesn't help that much--sure, Baum was WAY in the other direction as a writer (but of course he wrote for kids), rarely did Baum write anything particularly witty or clever. But Maguire seems to be opaque for the sake of being opaque. It's kind of annoying, there's no payoff. Why did Morrible enchant the three girls and why didn't they end up carrying out her plans? What was the point of the Philosophy Club sequence and how did it affect the participants? Why did her friendship with Glinda peter out? And why am I supposed to care about Sarima and her sisters and the children?
Although reading the synopsis of the musical--wow. They really DID change a lot! It's interesting, at first I thought "why the hell did Maguire allow that?" then I thought "well, they aren't his characters to begin with!" I did think the aftermath of the Witch's murder was beautifully depicted, and it's a shame that was changed.
Oh GOD, so tired. Lots of running back and forth today. Rachel's lil' birthday gathering was at her place last night--so much fun and good food. It was especially lovely standing on the balcony watching the snow come down. I spent the night at Kelly's (THANK YOU!) and then took the PATH back into the city, went to my doctor's for my weekly Vitamin B-12 shot (I have a new PCP, my old one retired and she did bloodwork and apparently I'm deficient in all sorts of vitamins so weekly shots. Yay. The co-pays are killing me). After this, took the train back home, studied a little before my discussion section, then took the train back to Morningside Heights for class. I LOVE my discussion section--we actually get to talk! And discuss! And ask questions! In fact we're required to do all this! My TA asked us what we thought about the professor and it's awesome that we all have pretty much the same take--although his lectures are interesting, he jumps around WAY too much, and the handouts are spiraling out of control, like the brooms in The Sorcerer's Apprentice. Interestingly she asked if we'd been doing the readings--uh, I thought that was required! I've been obsessing about whether or not I'd mastered every nuance of the readings, so I guess I'm doing okay.
Anyway after class I went back to Inwood again--I was going to close my eyes for just a few minutes (Tibby climbed adorably onto my chest to suzz) and woke up awhile later. I was so tired, I literally staggered out of my room and almost fell over. Oy. I meant to pick up my laptop but that didn't happen.
My Nicolae Ceauşescu Austerity Program to RepayRomania's Foreign Clara's School Debt* is still going well. We have so many handouts for this class (well over 100 pages so far and this is only the third week of class), I had to get a folder just to keep up with them, and I ONLY bought a folder, the least expensive kind, didn't buy one other thing at the bookstore! Plus I went through Cafe East, a little coffee place on campus that serves bubble tea and various kinds of Asian food and I was very tempted to get some sushi but I didn't!
*I made reference to this last night and Alex didn't understand what I meant--during Ceauşescu's regime, he financed a lot of domestic programs by borrowing heavily from Western powers. The debt devastated Romania's finances so he instituted a very severe austerity program to pay off the debt--just about everything was exported, electricity and all sorts of other utilities and services were strictly rationed. The standard of living in Romania plummeted during all this. Romania's history fascinates me--Ceauşescu was a complete villain by the end of his regime (and life, they ended at basically the same time) but when he was younger, he was quite a maverick vis à vis the Warsaw Pact signatories, openly condemning the invasion of Czechoslovakia and participating in the '84 Olympics and all.
Anyway after class I went back to Inwood again--I was going to close my eyes for just a few minutes (Tibby climbed adorably onto my chest to suzz) and woke up awhile later. I was so tired, I literally staggered out of my room and almost fell over. Oy. I meant to pick up my laptop but that didn't happen.
My Nicolae Ceauşescu Austerity Program to Repay
*I made reference to this last night and Alex didn't understand what I meant--during Ceauşescu's regime, he financed a lot of domestic programs by borrowing heavily from Western powers. The debt devastated Romania's finances so he instituted a very severe austerity program to pay off the debt--just about everything was exported, electricity and all sorts of other utilities and services were strictly rationed. The standard of living in Romania plummeted during all this. Romania's history fascinates me--Ceauşescu was a complete villain by the end of his regime (and life, they ended at basically the same time) but when he was younger, he was quite a maverick vis à vis the Warsaw Pact signatories, openly condemning the invasion of Czechoslovakia and participating in the '84 Olympics and all.
Wicked and Thoughts on Oz
Feb. 1st, 2010 06:27 pmI've been reading Wicked lately which Rachel was kind enough to lend to me. Very interesting book--very, very interesting. I'm just not sure if I like it yet. I think it's a fascinating take on the Oz universe although it seems to favor the movie over the books in some respects. The movie conflates the unnamed Good Witch of the North with Glinda, who is the Good Witch of the South. However as I was saying on Facebook, it's fascinating how he takes little things that are mentioned and explores them much more fully. Case in point: there is ONE throwaway mention of Krumbic Witches in the original series--in the last book, Ozma and Dorothy are confronting this snotty teenage witch/queen, Coo-Ee-Oh, who terrorizes her subjects in her little queendom way up in the Gillikin country. She says "I am a Krumbic Witch--the only Krumbic Witch in the world--and I fear the magic of no other creature that exists!" And that is IT, the only mention in all of the Baum books. But Maguire really develops this--it's a belief system, geographical features are named after the Krumbic. Very interesting.
And it's worth upending the Oz universe and examining some of its assumptions and biases. Talking with my mother, I realize how bizarrely anti-intellectual the books come off as sometimes. We'd been talking about the better books in the series, and she's never read Tik-Tok of Oz. TToO is actually based on one of Baum's earlier shows--it's about one of the minor Queens of Oz (Queen Ann of Oogaboo, reigning over "eighteen men, twenty-seven women and forty-four children") who decides she wants to conquer the rest of Oz. (Yet another strong female figure, a la General Jinjur.) Glinda sees what she's doing and casts a spell that makes them wander way off-course, across the desert, and they end up running into Betsy and Hank, Tik-Tok, one of my favorite characters, Polychrome the Rainbow's Daughter, and the Shaggy Man. The Shaggy Man always got on my nerves a bit, mainly because frankly I'm shallow and dislike ill-kempt people. But he has a tendency in this book, and none of the others, to quell people in a really annoying way. Someone will ask a question and Shaggy will jump in from across the room and say "Don't ask that--don't ask her or me either."
Then, after a pause, she added: "But where do you s'pose we're going to, Your Maj'sty?"
"Don't ask her that, please don't!" said Shaggy, who was not too far away to overhear them. "And please don't ask me why, either."
"Why?" said Betsy.
"No one can tell where we are going until we get there," replied Shaggy...
Um--what? How about minding your own damn business, Shaggy! He does this a couple of times on TToO. It reminds me of when I was at the West End Dinner Theater and Kim K. and I would talk about--oh, politics or T.S. Eliot or something, and Krissi D., never known for her intellectual tendencies, would whine (literally, she had this very distinctive squeaky voice) "Why are you talking about that? Don't talk about that."
Anyway, I remember reading an essay in Salon comparing the Narnia and Oz books, and one thing stuck with me. the essay said that in Oz, people are always declaring themselves--who they are and what they are. "Here in Oz, we..." "You're in the Land of Oz now where we..." This is a little mean-spirited but hilarious nonetheless:
Then there's the universal narcissism of the characters. Social conversation in Oz consists almost entirely of creatures explaining themselves to each other. It weirdly resembles the brandishing of identity credentials seen in certain graduate seminars, with "as a working-class lesbian ..." replaced by "as a scarecrow ..." In a typical disquisition, the straw man announces, "I am never hungry, and it is a lucky thing I am not. For my mouth is only painted, and if I should cut a hole in it so I could eat, the straw I am stuffed with would come out, and that would spoil the shape of my head." I mean, I love the books but yes, people ARE what they ARE, they never really change in the Oz universe. And they certainly don't grow, which creeped me out even as a child. Baum explains that when Oz became a fairyland, people stopped growing--nobody ever died, nobody got bigger and--this was creepiest of all--babies who were babies never got older. As organically feminist as the Oz books are (notice how most of the strong, kick-ass characters are female? Baum's mother in law was a suffragette and had a great influence on him), it's obvious the man has never had to watch a baby all day!
And don't get me started on the completely WTF? pacifist slant of The Emerald City of Oz (which I rave about in this entry, still so hilarious!). Okay, to sum up, the Nome King and a bunch of very, very evil allies--I mean, truly evil--are tunneling under the desert so they can invade Oz and enslave/murder everyone. Ozma happens to catch wind of this via the Magic Picture (don't ask me why Glinda wasn't on top of this) and she's all "hmm, isn't it sad that someone can be so angry?" and goes on her merry way, picking roses and whatnot. When Dorothy hears the news, she's devastated, as are Scarecrow and Tin Man. They, and all the others (Wizard, etc.) have a powwow to discuss what's to be done:
"Our enemies will be here sooner than I expected. What do you advise me to do?"
"It is now too late to assemble our people," said the Tin Woodman, despondently. "If you had allowed me to arm and drill my Winkies, we might have put up a good fight and destroyed many of our enemies before we were conquered."
"The Munchkins are good fighters, too," said Omby Amby; "and so are the Gillikins."
"But I do not wish to fight," declared Ozma, firmly. "No one has the right to destroy any living creatures, however evil they may be, or to hurt them or make them unhappy. I will not fight, even to save my kingdom."
ARE YOU F-ING KIDDING ME? You won't fight *even* to save all the innocents in your coutnry FROM getting killed? Oh good LORD. Look, even if you posit that self-defense is "evil" (a highly questionable statement), sometimes you have to do "evil" in order to prevent a worse evil. I have a feeling your subjects might feel a little differently about being handed over so blithely to the Nome and Growliwogs and Phanphasms just so your conscience is clear.
It gets better. Scarecrow has a genuinely good idea (not all of Baum's endings are as clever as this--frequently good conquers evil because of a completely new magical device that just enters out of nowhere (Rinkitink in Oz, an otherwise excellent book, is somewhat marred by its Dorothy-ex-machina resolution). Because the tunnel is going to emerge right on the royal grounds in front of the Water of Oblivion, he proposes to fill the tunnel with dust so that the armies get very thirsty--as soon as they exit the tunnel, they make a mad rush for the Fountain. Having drunk from it, they've now forgotten everything they've ever known and so are no longer evil, nor do they have any plans now to conquer Oz. In fact they're like little children now. And this is seen as a good thing:
"But, best of all," said Dorothy, "the wicked people have all forgotten their wickedness, and will not wish to hurt any one after this."
"True, Princess," declared the Shaggy Man. "It seems to me that to have reformed all those evil characters is more important than to have saved Oz."
Oh, shut up Shaggy, that's not really reform--they didn't genuinely repent, they didn't make a conscious choice to turn away from evil. That's more like a lobotomy!
And it's worth upending the Oz universe and examining some of its assumptions and biases. Talking with my mother, I realize how bizarrely anti-intellectual the books come off as sometimes. We'd been talking about the better books in the series, and she's never read Tik-Tok of Oz. TToO is actually based on one of Baum's earlier shows--it's about one of the minor Queens of Oz (Queen Ann of Oogaboo, reigning over "eighteen men, twenty-seven women and forty-four children") who decides she wants to conquer the rest of Oz. (Yet another strong female figure, a la General Jinjur.) Glinda sees what she's doing and casts a spell that makes them wander way off-course, across the desert, and they end up running into Betsy and Hank, Tik-Tok, one of my favorite characters, Polychrome the Rainbow's Daughter, and the Shaggy Man. The Shaggy Man always got on my nerves a bit, mainly because frankly I'm shallow and dislike ill-kempt people. But he has a tendency in this book, and none of the others, to quell people in a really annoying way. Someone will ask a question and Shaggy will jump in from across the room and say "Don't ask that--don't ask her or me either."
Then, after a pause, she added: "But where do you s'pose we're going to, Your Maj'sty?"
"Don't ask her that, please don't!" said Shaggy, who was not too far away to overhear them. "And please don't ask me why, either."
"Why?" said Betsy.
"No one can tell where we are going until we get there," replied Shaggy...
Um--what? How about minding your own damn business, Shaggy! He does this a couple of times on TToO. It reminds me of when I was at the West End Dinner Theater and Kim K. and I would talk about--oh, politics or T.S. Eliot or something, and Krissi D., never known for her intellectual tendencies, would whine (literally, she had this very distinctive squeaky voice) "Why are you talking about that? Don't talk about that."
Anyway, I remember reading an essay in Salon comparing the Narnia and Oz books, and one thing stuck with me. the essay said that in Oz, people are always declaring themselves--who they are and what they are. "Here in Oz, we..." "You're in the Land of Oz now where we..." This is a little mean-spirited but hilarious nonetheless:
Then there's the universal narcissism of the characters. Social conversation in Oz consists almost entirely of creatures explaining themselves to each other. It weirdly resembles the brandishing of identity credentials seen in certain graduate seminars, with "as a working-class lesbian ..." replaced by "as a scarecrow ..." In a typical disquisition, the straw man announces, "I am never hungry, and it is a lucky thing I am not. For my mouth is only painted, and if I should cut a hole in it so I could eat, the straw I am stuffed with would come out, and that would spoil the shape of my head." I mean, I love the books but yes, people ARE what they ARE, they never really change in the Oz universe. And they certainly don't grow, which creeped me out even as a child. Baum explains that when Oz became a fairyland, people stopped growing--nobody ever died, nobody got bigger and--this was creepiest of all--babies who were babies never got older. As organically feminist as the Oz books are (notice how most of the strong, kick-ass characters are female? Baum's mother in law was a suffragette and had a great influence on him), it's obvious the man has never had to watch a baby all day!
And don't get me started on the completely WTF? pacifist slant of The Emerald City of Oz (which I rave about in this entry, still so hilarious!). Okay, to sum up, the Nome King and a bunch of very, very evil allies--I mean, truly evil--are tunneling under the desert so they can invade Oz and enslave/murder everyone. Ozma happens to catch wind of this via the Magic Picture (don't ask me why Glinda wasn't on top of this) and she's all "hmm, isn't it sad that someone can be so angry?" and goes on her merry way, picking roses and whatnot. When Dorothy hears the news, she's devastated, as are Scarecrow and Tin Man. They, and all the others (Wizard, etc.) have a powwow to discuss what's to be done:
"Our enemies will be here sooner than I expected. What do you advise me to do?"
"It is now too late to assemble our people," said the Tin Woodman, despondently. "If you had allowed me to arm and drill my Winkies, we might have put up a good fight and destroyed many of our enemies before we were conquered."
"The Munchkins are good fighters, too," said Omby Amby; "and so are the Gillikins."
"But I do not wish to fight," declared Ozma, firmly. "No one has the right to destroy any living creatures, however evil they may be, or to hurt them or make them unhappy. I will not fight, even to save my kingdom."
ARE YOU F-ING KIDDING ME? You won't fight *even* to save all the innocents in your coutnry FROM getting killed? Oh good LORD. Look, even if you posit that self-defense is "evil" (a highly questionable statement), sometimes you have to do "evil" in order to prevent a worse evil. I have a feeling your subjects might feel a little differently about being handed over so blithely to the Nome and Growliwogs and Phanphasms just so your conscience is clear.
It gets better. Scarecrow has a genuinely good idea (not all of Baum's endings are as clever as this--frequently good conquers evil because of a completely new magical device that just enters out of nowhere (Rinkitink in Oz, an otherwise excellent book, is somewhat marred by its Dorothy-ex-machina resolution). Because the tunnel is going to emerge right on the royal grounds in front of the Water of Oblivion, he proposes to fill the tunnel with dust so that the armies get very thirsty--as soon as they exit the tunnel, they make a mad rush for the Fountain. Having drunk from it, they've now forgotten everything they've ever known and so are no longer evil, nor do they have any plans now to conquer Oz. In fact they're like little children now. And this is seen as a good thing:
"But, best of all," said Dorothy, "the wicked people have all forgotten their wickedness, and will not wish to hurt any one after this."
"True, Princess," declared the Shaggy Man. "It seems to me that to have reformed all those evil characters is more important than to have saved Oz."
Oh, shut up Shaggy, that's not really reform--they didn't genuinely repent, they didn't make a conscious choice to turn away from evil. That's more like a lobotomy!
Speshul Snowflakes
Jan. 25th, 2010 01:06 pmOh dear Lord. GOD, do I love college-age, entitled tools. They're like Halloween candy.
This is priceless:
College Student argues for the "right" to text in class, advancing the never-ever-before-used (and completely respectful to those professors who are grading him) argument that "I'm a paying customer, therefore I deserve to set the terms."
Some gems:
I’m sure others out there are experiencing my pain when it comes to professors and the obnoxious policies they implement regarding cell phone usage during lecture. In the past, I’ve tolerated their dictatorship like authority and snuck messages under the desk or behind my laptop, but that era is over. In my latest course, the professor thinks he has the right to automatically deduct 10% of a students final grade for any single use of cell phones: that means texting, tweeting, facebooking, and the like.
In most instances when it comes to colleges and universities, I find that they operate under a backwards business model. As a rule of thumb, customers come first. After all, satisfied customers means increased revenue and likeliness that references will be acquired. Nope. Not with education. Many academic institutions (from a financial standpoint, they are businesses) treat students with little respect. Yet, enrollment is ever growing. Why? Because “a degree is what you need to succeed” in today’s society. That means school officials operate under a do as I please system.
Oh, you poor, poor thing! Those horrible dictators! How dare they infringe upon your right to express yourself any. way. you. like. After all, you (and you alone, like not any taxpayers or corporations or anything) pay their salary, right?
No school has the right to bar me from texting during class. I pay their fees for a degree, in turn, respect my decision to text.
You GO, you just go. Soldier on, brave one. Fight the good fight for the rest of us!
Believe it or not, you are employed by me in this situation. “Deal with it,” as quoted by Tyler Durden. You get your paycheck one way or the other.
Oh, WOW. Yeah, that'll get them on your side.
As for “WHY” I text: I have a social life.
Just keep digging that hole.
I loved this, from one responder:
WHY is it so important to you to be allowed to play with your rattle while the grownup is talking?
And I loved the snark on the picture--that picture is just begging to be mocked:

I am special. I am SPECIAL.
He's SRSLY, you guys! He will not be ignored!
If there's one thing that I love to mock, it's children with over-developed sense of entitlement. I'd love to know what his parents think--I'm thinking they're helicopter parents. And on a more serious note, his attempt to reduce a college education, one in which he is privileged to participate by virtue of many factors beyond his control--a college education where you're given the Keys to the Kingdom and get to sit and learn and read and discuss and make each other smarter, more productive members of society and drink in the knowledge of the expert--to reduce it to some sort of business model, "I paid my fucking money, now give me what I want"--it makes me want to vomit. How dare you desecrate education like that? What. A. Tool.
Oh God--I'm giggling now, having followed a trackback to a weary professor's blog who talks about such students and their "self of steam" issues (apparently a common compositional misspelling in student papers). It took me a second to get that but now I'm laughing out loud.
This is priceless:
College Student argues for the "right" to text in class, advancing the never-ever-before-used (and completely respectful to those professors who are grading him) argument that "I'm a paying customer, therefore I deserve to set the terms."
Some gems:
I’m sure others out there are experiencing my pain when it comes to professors and the obnoxious policies they implement regarding cell phone usage during lecture. In the past, I’ve tolerated their dictatorship like authority and snuck messages under the desk or behind my laptop, but that era is over. In my latest course, the professor thinks he has the right to automatically deduct 10% of a students final grade for any single use of cell phones: that means texting, tweeting, facebooking, and the like.
In most instances when it comes to colleges and universities, I find that they operate under a backwards business model. As a rule of thumb, customers come first. After all, satisfied customers means increased revenue and likeliness that references will be acquired. Nope. Not with education. Many academic institutions (from a financial standpoint, they are businesses) treat students with little respect. Yet, enrollment is ever growing. Why? Because “a degree is what you need to succeed” in today’s society. That means school officials operate under a do as I please system.
Oh, you poor, poor thing! Those horrible dictators! How dare they infringe upon your right to express yourself any. way. you. like. After all, you (and you alone, like not any taxpayers or corporations or anything) pay their salary, right?
No school has the right to bar me from texting during class. I pay their fees for a degree, in turn, respect my decision to text.
You GO, you just go. Soldier on, brave one. Fight the good fight for the rest of us!
Believe it or not, you are employed by me in this situation. “Deal with it,” as quoted by Tyler Durden. You get your paycheck one way or the other.
Oh, WOW. Yeah, that'll get them on your side.
As for “WHY” I text: I have a social life.
Just keep digging that hole.
I loved this, from one responder:
WHY is it so important to you to be allowed to play with your rattle while the grownup is talking?
And I loved the snark on the picture--that picture is just begging to be mocked:
I am special. I am SPECIAL.
He's SRSLY, you guys! He will not be ignored!
If there's one thing that I love to mock, it's children with over-developed sense of entitlement. I'd love to know what his parents think--I'm thinking they're helicopter parents. And on a more serious note, his attempt to reduce a college education, one in which he is privileged to participate by virtue of many factors beyond his control--a college education where you're given the Keys to the Kingdom and get to sit and learn and read and discuss and make each other smarter, more productive members of society and drink in the knowledge of the expert--to reduce it to some sort of business model, "I paid my fucking money, now give me what I want"--it makes me want to vomit. How dare you desecrate education like that? What. A. Tool.
Oh God--I'm giggling now, having followed a trackback to a weary professor's blog who talks about such students and their "self of steam" issues (apparently a common compositional misspelling in student papers). It took me a second to get that but now I'm laughing out loud.
It is a cold day in Hell right now...
Jan. 24th, 2010 11:57 pmThe Saints are goin' to the Super Bowl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh. My. God. WOW. This is HUGE, y'all. The SAINTS, this just does not happen.
Well, obviously God was listening to me Saturday afternoon because I went to Saturday 5:00 Mass at St. Mary's and our rector said we should pray for the Jets "even though it's not going to help" and I spoke up "we should pray for the Saints!" Of course I was making a liturgical joke but yes, I do love the Saints and YEEHAW!!!! Geaux Saints!!!!!!
And guys, I'd support you no matter who you were playing but you especially gotta kick the snot out of the Colts. I grew up in DC, we do not forgive (the Indy Colts used to be the Balmer Colts, and they picked up literally in the middle of the night and skedaddled out of Balmer. I'm a DCer, not from our neighboring city, but we thought it was disgusting).
Geaux Saints!!!!!
Unbelievable. History, man.
Oh. My. God. WOW. This is HUGE, y'all. The SAINTS, this just does not happen.
Well, obviously God was listening to me Saturday afternoon because I went to Saturday 5:00 Mass at St. Mary's and our rector said we should pray for the Jets "even though it's not going to help" and I spoke up "we should pray for the Saints!" Of course I was making a liturgical joke but yes, I do love the Saints and YEEHAW!!!! Geaux Saints!!!!!!
And guys, I'd support you no matter who you were playing but you especially gotta kick the snot out of the Colts. I grew up in DC, we do not forgive (the Indy Colts used to be the Balmer Colts, and they picked up literally in the middle of the night and skedaddled out of Balmer. I'm a DCer, not from our neighboring city, but we thought it was disgusting).
Geaux Saints!!!!!
Unbelievable. History, man.
So...
if Etruscan is not an Indo-European language...where did the Etruscans come from? They couldn't have been indigenous if they're surrounded by Italic peoples.
Oooh--according to Wikipedia,
Outside of Italy inscriptions have been found in Africa, Corsica, Elba, Gallia Narbonensis, Greece, the Balkans and the Black Sea.
God, it's so frustrating trying to figure this out when the only other languages in the Tyrrhenian family are ALSO dead! *Grumble, grumble* Sassa-frassin' Etruscans, if you were going to be so darn influential, you should have tried to keep your language alive a little longer! Did you know there's only one Etruscan piece of literature still extant?
Italy is geographically (and now, as a result, politically--there is a lot of cultural conflict between the North and the South) fragmented land. The Appennine range runs down the spine of the peninsula and throughout most of Italy--only seven percent of the land mass is plain. There are three major lowland regions--
*the Po Valley (the "top" of Italy) which opens up to the relatively restricted Adriatic;
*Apulia in the southeast (the "heel") which also opens up the the Adriatic;
and most significantly,
*the region comprising modern-day Tuscany (Etruria), Lazio (Latium) and Campania. This region opens up to the Mediterranean, a much broader social, technological and economic vista. This region offered a huge advantage to its peoples--one explanation for Rome's later success.
if Etruscan is not an Indo-European language...where did the Etruscans come from? They couldn't have been indigenous if they're surrounded by Italic peoples.
Oooh--according to Wikipedia,
Outside of Italy inscriptions have been found in Africa, Corsica, Elba, Gallia Narbonensis, Greece, the Balkans and the Black Sea.
God, it's so frustrating trying to figure this out when the only other languages in the Tyrrhenian family are ALSO dead! *Grumble, grumble* Sassa-frassin' Etruscans, if you were going to be so darn influential, you should have tried to keep your language alive a little longer! Did you know there's only one Etruscan piece of literature still extant?
Italy is geographically (and now, as a result, politically--there is a lot of cultural conflict between the North and the South) fragmented land. The Appennine range runs down the spine of the peninsula and throughout most of Italy--only seven percent of the land mass is plain. There are three major lowland regions--
*the Po Valley (the "top" of Italy) which opens up to the relatively restricted Adriatic;
*Apulia in the southeast (the "heel") which also opens up the the Adriatic;
and most significantly,
*the region comprising modern-day Tuscany (Etruria), Lazio (Latium) and Campania. This region opens up to the Mediterranean, a much broader social, technological and economic vista. This region offered a huge advantage to its peoples--one explanation for Rome's later success.
Heads Up, Stitchers
Jan. 22nd, 2010 04:19 pmTesse and I are doing another Drunken Knitting sesh at my place Sunday evening, starting around 7 (maybe earlier, depending on when we get back from Three Sisters. It's Chekovian angst though, I don't think it's going to run that much under 3 hours). We were gonna get together last week but it ended up being moved to Rachel's place, and then Tesse couldn't make it, so this is a makeup sesh of sorts. All are welcome, of course, and I talked to Susan who is likely to be there as well.
I'm going to try to finish that complicated herring-bone-stitch bag beforehand and start an easier project, so I can concentrate on the conversation better!
This is last minute so don't feel bad if you can't make it, we just didn't want anyone to feel left out. If you are coming, just let me or Tesse know.
I'm going to try to finish that complicated herring-bone-stitch bag beforehand and start an easier project, so I can concentrate on the conversation better!
This is last minute so don't feel bad if you can't make it, we just didn't want anyone to feel left out. If you are coming, just let me or Tesse know.
Classical Movies
Jan. 22nd, 2010 11:50 amI gotta say now, as in 21st century (at least the first ten years), is a GOOD time in which to become interested in classical history. Thanks to Gladiator, the sword-and-sandal genre has been revived, and I've been able to add tons of such movies and TV shows to my Netflix queue. In addition to
*Gladiator (which has the added bonus of being actually good with Russell Crowe having won Best Actor and crazy-ass Joaquin Phoenix being nominated for Supporting Actor), there's also
*the HBO series Rome of which I've only seen a few eps but which looks extremely promising;
*Troy which wasn't well-reviewed and doesn't actually have much to do with Rome except that one Roman tradition was that Aeneas, a Trojan prince who escaped from the city, later founded Rome. But notwithstanding I really liked Troy--I liked everyone in it, even Orlando Bloom who actually made Paris likeable. I also respected how they made Helen thoughtful and intelligent. And the eye-candy was off the hook! Eric Bana as Hector and Brad Pitt and His Abs as Achilles--rowr!
*Helen of Troy, a mini-series that aired in 2003. I watched it then on TV, and then watched the DVD about 6-7 months ago. This teleplay covers a lot more ground than Troy did because it's not based on The Iliad (heck, even Troy covered more ground than The Iliad, which only covers the last few weeks of the Trojan War)--Helen of Troy is, naturally, about Helen and it starts with her abduction by Theseus, and ends with the aftermath of the War. An odd cast--an English model as Helen who gives a game, energetic performance but her inexperience shows. And she's a little too toothily British to really pass for the face that launched a thousand ships. The guy who plays Menelaus is quite good and makes him very sympathetic, and the woman who plays Cassandra is AWESOME. When she sees Paris again for the first time in years, she has this LOOK on her face and she whispers to him in amazement you should be dead. Good stuff. The guy who plays Odysseus is good, too (they always seem to get good Odyssei, Sean Bean was also great in Troy). The weirdest bit of casting is Stellan Skarsgård as....Theseus? Stellan Skarsgård is a fine character actor but well past his prime physically and really completely miscast as Theseus the Strapping Hero of Greek myth.
But then the big guns come in--John Rhys-Davies as Priam. He's terrific. And the best is Rufus Sewell as Agamemnon--God, he is fantastic, absolutely riveting through the whole piece. His best scene is when he sacrifices Iphigeneia--this complete psychopath actually loves his daughter but the course is SET, the Achaean army is determined to sail, and if he has to make sacrifices to ensure positive winds, then that's what he's going to do. It's a fantastic scene, you see this adorable giggling girl being walked up to the altar by two soldiers, then you see the knife come down as her scarf is dangling over the edge of the altar and Agamemnon's sick, determined expression--then the winds start blowing. Just great. Another really good scene is when the Horse is revealed for the first time--you see it from this little boy's point of view, the camera sweeps and this enormous horse is looming over him, with this weird exotic music playing. And when they're dragging in the horse, the sun is setting in the background as the music is ratcheting up the tension and it's just a perfectly constructed scene. Trojans, this is Atë writ large--it arrived on your doorstep and you broke your own city gates to force it in. No wonder this story has lasted the ages.
*A side note--I've talked about this before but the city of Troy actually existed, roughly where Homer says it did (remember, The Iliad was first written down about 700 BC). They've done archaeological research on it, and there have been many different...uh, iterations, I guess you could say, of the city on that site. So they number them, and Troy VII is the one that was there in about the 12th or 11th century BC, when the Trojan War is said to have happened. There is no historical evidence that the characters, Helen, Paris, Hector, etc., actually existed, but they do know that the city was leveled by a war. And they know that Troy VI was leveled by an earthquake. Often, as stories are handed down, the narratives get conflated, and one explanation for the Trojan Horse is that the storytellers conflated the destructions of the two versions of the city. This is the theory--there was a myth of an enormous horse that was delivered to the city in the context of the war and caused its destruction. How did the mythmakers decide upon a horse? Because horses are a symbol of Poseidon (the whitecaps are the manes)--and in the eastern Mediterranean, earthquakes come from the sea. Isn't that fascinating?
Ahen. Back to sword-and-sandal movies. Another one is this new TV series, Spartacus which got an hilariously snarky review in the Washington Post. Ain't nothing not to like in sweaty Roman men beating the crap out of each other.
*Gladiator (which has the added bonus of being actually good with Russell Crowe having won Best Actor and crazy-ass Joaquin Phoenix being nominated for Supporting Actor), there's also
*the HBO series Rome of which I've only seen a few eps but which looks extremely promising;
*Troy which wasn't well-reviewed and doesn't actually have much to do with Rome except that one Roman tradition was that Aeneas, a Trojan prince who escaped from the city, later founded Rome. But notwithstanding I really liked Troy--I liked everyone in it, even Orlando Bloom who actually made Paris likeable. I also respected how they made Helen thoughtful and intelligent. And the eye-candy was off the hook! Eric Bana as Hector and Brad Pitt and His Abs as Achilles--rowr!
*Helen of Troy, a mini-series that aired in 2003. I watched it then on TV, and then watched the DVD about 6-7 months ago. This teleplay covers a lot more ground than Troy did because it's not based on The Iliad (heck, even Troy covered more ground than The Iliad, which only covers the last few weeks of the Trojan War)--Helen of Troy is, naturally, about Helen and it starts with her abduction by Theseus, and ends with the aftermath of the War. An odd cast--an English model as Helen who gives a game, energetic performance but her inexperience shows. And she's a little too toothily British to really pass for the face that launched a thousand ships. The guy who plays Menelaus is quite good and makes him very sympathetic, and the woman who plays Cassandra is AWESOME. When she sees Paris again for the first time in years, she has this LOOK on her face and she whispers to him in amazement you should be dead. Good stuff. The guy who plays Odysseus is good, too (they always seem to get good Odyssei, Sean Bean was also great in Troy). The weirdest bit of casting is Stellan Skarsgård as....Theseus? Stellan Skarsgård is a fine character actor but well past his prime physically and really completely miscast as Theseus the Strapping Hero of Greek myth.
But then the big guns come in--John Rhys-Davies as Priam. He's terrific. And the best is Rufus Sewell as Agamemnon--God, he is fantastic, absolutely riveting through the whole piece. His best scene is when he sacrifices Iphigeneia--this complete psychopath actually loves his daughter but the course is SET, the Achaean army is determined to sail, and if he has to make sacrifices to ensure positive winds, then that's what he's going to do. It's a fantastic scene, you see this adorable giggling girl being walked up to the altar by two soldiers, then you see the knife come down as her scarf is dangling over the edge of the altar and Agamemnon's sick, determined expression--then the winds start blowing. Just great. Another really good scene is when the Horse is revealed for the first time--you see it from this little boy's point of view, the camera sweeps and this enormous horse is looming over him, with this weird exotic music playing. And when they're dragging in the horse, the sun is setting in the background as the music is ratcheting up the tension and it's just a perfectly constructed scene. Trojans, this is Atë writ large--it arrived on your doorstep and you broke your own city gates to force it in. No wonder this story has lasted the ages.
*A side note--I've talked about this before but the city of Troy actually existed, roughly where Homer says it did (remember, The Iliad was first written down about 700 BC). They've done archaeological research on it, and there have been many different...uh, iterations, I guess you could say, of the city on that site. So they number them, and Troy VII is the one that was there in about the 12th or 11th century BC, when the Trojan War is said to have happened. There is no historical evidence that the characters, Helen, Paris, Hector, etc., actually existed, but they do know that the city was leveled by a war. And they know that Troy VI was leveled by an earthquake. Often, as stories are handed down, the narratives get conflated, and one explanation for the Trojan Horse is that the storytellers conflated the destructions of the two versions of the city. This is the theory--there was a myth of an enormous horse that was delivered to the city in the context of the war and caused its destruction. How did the mythmakers decide upon a horse? Because horses are a symbol of Poseidon (the whitecaps are the manes)--and in the eastern Mediterranean, earthquakes come from the sea. Isn't that fascinating?
Ahen. Back to sword-and-sandal movies. Another one is this new TV series, Spartacus which got an hilariously snarky review in the Washington Post. Ain't nothing not to like in sweaty Roman men beating the crap out of each other.
So, class. Class started last Tuesday and it has been a bu-sssssy week for me. Normally I work Mondays, Thursdays and Friday--this week Monday was a holiday, so I worked Tuesday instead--which meant my first two days of class were a little hectic, running from and to work. I have to get to work early to make up the hours. Luckily the woman for whom I work is amazing and is cool with this, very supportive.
I get to class early on Tuesday and we're in a little lecture hall. I take a seat in the third row and the room really starts filling up. The class is limited to 100 but there looked like more than that--and quite a few of them, at least 20, didn't get seats and had to sit against the wall or on the window sill. Our professor really seems to know his stuff but he has a strong Italian accent and tends to speak softly, so you have to listen intently to make sure you understand what he's saying. This wouldn't be so bad, except that of course you're also taking notes, and when you're writing, you might misunderstand a word in his accent. It can be a little grueling, you really cannot phase out during the lecture. I mean, I find the course material fascinating, I'm certainly not bored, but every now and then your mind might want to wander and you just can't.
The class was so stuffed that they ended up moving it to another building, and today's class was in a good old-fashioned huge-ass lecture hall with a balcony and an aisle down the middle, just like in Mona Lisa Smile. Although it was nice to be able to spread out--again I took a seat closeup in the fourth row--the volume was even worse, because of the slight echo and again, the accent. At one point he started a new topic and said a word like mayedeeTERRuneyan. We all sat there frozen, as he said several things about this mayedeeTERRuneyan, desperately listening to the rest of it to try to decipher the context and finally it all hit us at the same time: Mediterranean. As one, 90+ students bent over and frantically scribbled the salient points of the last five sentences he's just uttered. He was able to pump up the volume a bit for the lecture but I may try to sit in the first row, and the TA has promised to get a mike. For the most part the professor lectures but he does throw out questions to us, and of course I'm all raising my hand. Professor: "What distinctive features does the mayedeeTERRuneyan have that helped shape the cultures around it?" My hand shoots up immediately: "It's small and easily navigible, which encourages the growth of trading and the spread of technology." I might've also added: "Plus when you're doing a cruise ship contract on it, Spain has topless beaches where you can buy beers, which encourages social contact and better tans, which I think we can all agree is good for everyone!"
During the first class, they sent around a questionnaire for us to fill out, asking what our classics background was, what we wanted to get out of the class, which particular areas we wanted most to study. I put down as particular areas of interest: Roman lit, especially the plays and epic poems, and the late Empire. What I really want to explore are all the insane-ass emperors. Nero and Caligula? Yes, please. The drama, like Antony and Octavius, sparring across the seas, Titus Andronicus and Tamora, baking people into pies. Shakespeare didn't write about nice tame safe Romans--he wrote about the exciting ones who did cool shit.
Columbia has an online feature called Courseworks--it's accessible through their website, and this is where you can download all the delicious graphics in the PowerPoint lecture you just attended (during his lecture today he kept scrolling through the slides to get to the one he wanted, and they all looked SO tempting). This is awesome enough but it gets better--it also features links to online libraries, including Oxford and Cambridge, and access to approximately a bajillian scholarly journals, stuff you just can't get on your own unless you go in person to a library. Oh man, am I drooling. PLUS you can borrow books from all the other Ivy League school (except for Harvard, *sniff*). There's just SO MUCH KNOWLEDGE out there, and now *I* get to roll around in it!
I get to class early on Tuesday and we're in a little lecture hall. I take a seat in the third row and the room really starts filling up. The class is limited to 100 but there looked like more than that--and quite a few of them, at least 20, didn't get seats and had to sit against the wall or on the window sill. Our professor really seems to know his stuff but he has a strong Italian accent and tends to speak softly, so you have to listen intently to make sure you understand what he's saying. This wouldn't be so bad, except that of course you're also taking notes, and when you're writing, you might misunderstand a word in his accent. It can be a little grueling, you really cannot phase out during the lecture. I mean, I find the course material fascinating, I'm certainly not bored, but every now and then your mind might want to wander and you just can't.
The class was so stuffed that they ended up moving it to another building, and today's class was in a good old-fashioned huge-ass lecture hall with a balcony and an aisle down the middle, just like in Mona Lisa Smile. Although it was nice to be able to spread out--again I took a seat closeup in the fourth row--the volume was even worse, because of the slight echo and again, the accent. At one point he started a new topic and said a word like mayedeeTERRuneyan. We all sat there frozen, as he said several things about this mayedeeTERRuneyan, desperately listening to the rest of it to try to decipher the context and finally it all hit us at the same time: Mediterranean. As one, 90+ students bent over and frantically scribbled the salient points of the last five sentences he's just uttered. He was able to pump up the volume a bit for the lecture but I may try to sit in the first row, and the TA has promised to get a mike. For the most part the professor lectures but he does throw out questions to us, and of course I'm all raising my hand. Professor: "What distinctive features does the mayedeeTERRuneyan have that helped shape the cultures around it?" My hand shoots up immediately: "It's small and easily navigible, which encourages the growth of trading and the spread of technology." I might've also added: "Plus when you're doing a cruise ship contract on it, Spain has topless beaches where you can buy beers, which encourages social contact and better tans, which I think we can all agree is good for everyone!"
During the first class, they sent around a questionnaire for us to fill out, asking what our classics background was, what we wanted to get out of the class, which particular areas we wanted most to study. I put down as particular areas of interest: Roman lit, especially the plays and epic poems, and the late Empire. What I really want to explore are all the insane-ass emperors. Nero and Caligula? Yes, please. The drama, like Antony and Octavius, sparring across the seas, Titus Andronicus and Tamora, baking people into pies. Shakespeare didn't write about nice tame safe Romans--he wrote about the exciting ones who did cool shit.
Columbia has an online feature called Courseworks--it's accessible through their website, and this is where you can download all the delicious graphics in the PowerPoint lecture you just attended (during his lecture today he kept scrolling through the slides to get to the one he wanted, and they all looked SO tempting). This is awesome enough but it gets better--it also features links to online libraries, including Oxford and Cambridge, and access to approximately a bajillian scholarly journals, stuff you just can't get on your own unless you go in person to a library. Oh man, am I drooling. PLUS you can borrow books from all the other Ivy League school (except for Harvard, *sniff*). There's just SO MUCH KNOWLEDGE out there, and now *I* get to roll around in it!
From Ancient Rome: A History
Jan. 20th, 2010 07:18 pm...It is estimated that only about five percent of all the compositions of ancient writers actually survives.
Oh, MAN. Five percent. Unbelievable. We are missing out on so much. Why did that stupid fire have to burn down the Alexandrian library, why? Just imagine what else is out there, that we know about because other writers have referred to it, but don't actually have? I feel sick. I feel like Thomasina, the loss of such knowledge literally sickens me.
Can you just imagine how amazing it would be to discover the literary, Greek or Roman equivalent of the Dead Sea Scrolls?
Oh, MAN. Five percent. Unbelievable. We are missing out on so much. Why did that stupid fire have to burn down the Alexandrian library, why? Just imagine what else is out there, that we know about because other writers have referred to it, but don't actually have? I feel sick. I feel like Thomasina, the loss of such knowledge literally sickens me.
Can you just imagine how amazing it would be to discover the literary, Greek or Roman equivalent of the Dead Sea Scrolls?
(no subject)
Jan. 19th, 2010 04:59 pmTaxes, so tedious. But this year I got smart and started a spreadsheet and entered the receipts as I generated them. In categories. I know, right? That's 8 hours of toil saved right there (well, not really saved, I just did it in bits and pieces over the past year--but that means I get my refund THAT MUCH FASTER. Woo hoo!
Because ladies and gentlemen, I am extremely poor. Really, really poor. I am now on the Nicolae Ceauşescu Austerity program to Pay OffRomania's foreign Clara's school debt. No going out and dropping $20 on drinks, no impulsive sushi purchases, no *sob* impromptu dinners at Indian Road Cafe. Cannot. Afford. It. Srsly. All socializing will have to be done at someone's apartment, or at the park or something. Maybe a splurge of a cup of coffee, but it won't be Starbucks.
Speaking of which, our start-up again of Drunken Knitting this weekend was so much fun--love to do it again soon! See, you can have a good time without dropping lots of money! Let's think about another one in a month or so.
Had my first class today--woo hoo!
Because ladies and gentlemen, I am extremely poor. Really, really poor. I am now on the Nicolae Ceauşescu Austerity program to Pay Off
Speaking of which, our start-up again of Drunken Knitting this weekend was so much fun--love to do it again soon! See, you can have a good time without dropping lots of money! Let's think about another one in a month or so.
Had my first class today--woo hoo!
An idea whose time has come...
Jan. 18th, 2010 11:29 pmPat Robertson Voodoo Doll
100% of the proceeds are donated to the Red Cross. Rush Limbaugh doll to follow.
(The best part is the Q&A at the bottom.)
100% of the proceeds are donated to the Red Cross. Rush Limbaugh doll to follow.
(The best part is the Q&A at the bottom.)
The Silk Road
Jan. 14th, 2010 03:07 pmSo, I got my Columbia ID the other day, yay! Very exciting strolling across the campus and picking up Columbia newspapers. They had an option for new students where you could upload your own picture as long as it was head-on, in color and showed your shoulders. I thought about uploading some of my yellow bikini pictures...
I've been looking at this new exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History--The Silk Road. It's about the system of routes between Europe and the near and far East traveled by merchants (mostly), statesman, explorers, etc. Marco Polo went to Asia via the Silk Road. I'm especially interested because the bubonic plague entered the European continent via the Silk Road, and some of the cities along the Road were the first hit, like Caffa and Genoa.
We have this image of late-medieval Europe as being so isolated and insular, and certainly it was compared to the High Middle Ages, when the Crusades were in full swing. By the 1300s Europe was slouching towards a Malthusian disaster that came riiiight on schedule. But even against that terrible background...merchants were still making the arduous overland journey to Damascus and Baghdad, to Samarkand, to unnamed Asian cities that glittered in the distance, eager to share their riches.
Anyway, I was gloomily checking out the suggested AMNH admission price--$16, which frankly is a lot for one exhibit, for me anyway. I is po right now. And I'm not even sure if the Silk Road exhibit is extra. Then it occurred to me--the suggested student price is $12!
I've been looking at this new exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History--The Silk Road. It's about the system of routes between Europe and the near and far East traveled by merchants (mostly), statesman, explorers, etc. Marco Polo went to Asia via the Silk Road. I'm especially interested because the bubonic plague entered the European continent via the Silk Road, and some of the cities along the Road were the first hit, like Caffa and Genoa.
We have this image of late-medieval Europe as being so isolated and insular, and certainly it was compared to the High Middle Ages, when the Crusades were in full swing. By the 1300s Europe was slouching towards a Malthusian disaster that came riiiight on schedule. But even against that terrible background...merchants were still making the arduous overland journey to Damascus and Baghdad, to Samarkand, to unnamed Asian cities that glittered in the distance, eager to share their riches.
Anyway, I was gloomily checking out the suggested AMNH admission price--$16, which frankly is a lot for one exhibit, for me anyway. I is po right now. And I'm not even sure if the Silk Road exhibit is extra. Then it occurred to me--the suggested student price is $12!