Shallow Celebrity Dish-Oriented Post
Apr. 17th, 2006 02:41 pmOkay, so apparently there are lots of rumors floating about the 'Net about Tiny Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes and their "baby." I say this, because it seems quite a few believe either 1) she is not pregnant or B) she is pregnant but it's Chris Klein's baby. Quelle scandale!
This is the picture that started it all:

Now does that look like a fetus to you? No, it does not. That looks like a pillow stuck down in her dress, as though she's...already given birth but is hiding it, for some reason.
Now, this picture was taken when she first announced when she was pregnant back in October:

She was, at the most, 3 months along then, according to the official line (that is, that Tom is the father via Hot Manly Heterosexual Sex). And she looks like THAT? Seems awfully far along for three months...
On my message board, the discussion went from whether or notHoney Katie is actually pregnant to general musings on TTC. Someone called TTC "Toothy McNotGay" which is AWESOME. And then someone else posted a quotation from an article:
(from AP) Tom Cruise enjoys a "spectacular" sex life with his pregnant fiancee Katie Holmes, because they have such good communications skills. The Hollywood actor reveals his sex secrets in the May issue of GQ magazine, declaring the physical act is a "by-product" of a successful pairing. Cruise enthuses, "Sex is about the connection. Great sex is a by-product, for me, of a great relationship, where you have communication and it's an extension of that. Where it's just free. And that's how it should be. It's spectacular. If you're not in good communication with your partner, it sucks. (Meaningless sex outside of a relationship) is really horrible and pathetic and lonely."
And then she commented,
How is it that Tom makes even fairly reasonable statements sound extra-crazy? It's like all the words that come out of his mouth go through an Insanifier first.
(Is the Insanifier sort of like the Babelfish?)
And then someone else responded (to the "Where it's just free" TTC statement):
Free sex sure beats paying those male prostitutes. And then paying them some more to keep quiet. And then paying the hitmen when the male prositutes just don't know how to keep their traps shut.
Man. Poor Katie. WEIRD.
This is the picture that started it all:

Now does that look like a fetus to you? No, it does not. That looks like a pillow stuck down in her dress, as though she's...already given birth but is hiding it, for some reason.
Now, this picture was taken when she first announced when she was pregnant back in October:

She was, at the most, 3 months along then, according to the official line (that is, that Tom is the father via Hot Manly Heterosexual Sex). And she looks like THAT? Seems awfully far along for three months...
On my message board, the discussion went from whether or not
(from AP) Tom Cruise enjoys a "spectacular" sex life with his pregnant fiancee Katie Holmes, because they have such good communications skills. The Hollywood actor reveals his sex secrets in the May issue of GQ magazine, declaring the physical act is a "by-product" of a successful pairing. Cruise enthuses, "Sex is about the connection. Great sex is a by-product, for me, of a great relationship, where you have communication and it's an extension of that. Where it's just free. And that's how it should be. It's spectacular. If you're not in good communication with your partner, it sucks. (Meaningless sex outside of a relationship) is really horrible and pathetic and lonely."
And then she commented,
How is it that Tom makes even fairly reasonable statements sound extra-crazy? It's like all the words that come out of his mouth go through an Insanifier first.
(Is the Insanifier sort of like the Babelfish?)
And then someone else responded (to the "Where it's just free" TTC statement):
Free sex sure beats paying those male prostitutes. And then paying them some more to keep quiet. And then paying the hitmen when the male prositutes just don't know how to keep their traps shut.
Man. Poor Katie. WEIRD.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 07:12 pm (UTC)the whole thing is just all sorts of odd.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 07:24 pm (UTC)Sorry.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 07:50 pm (UTC)