We are not entitled to our own facts
Jun. 17th, 2005 12:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ceebeegeeAwesome column in the Washington Post about the Schiavo autopsy:
We are entitled to our moral, ethical and philosophical commitments. We are not entitled to our own facts.
...We should not "move on," as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist suggested. No, we cannot move on until those politicians who felt entitled to make up facts and toss around unwarranted conclusions about Schiavo's condition take responsibility for what they said -- and apologize.
...So the big-government conservatives had to invent a story. They had to insist that they knew, just knew, more about Terri Schiavo's condition than the doctors on the scene. They had to question Michael Schiavo's motives and imply that he wanted to, well, get rid of her.
"As I understand it," Frist said on the Senate floor, "Terri's husband will not divorce Terri and will not allow her parents to take care of her. Terri's husband, who I have not met, does have a girlfriend he lives with and they have children of their own." No accusation here, just a brisk walk through innuendo city.
Dr. Frist, as he likes to be known, didn't just make his case as a pro-lifer. He invoked his expertise as a member of the medical profession. "I close this evening speaking more as a physician than as a U.S. senator," Frist said during the March 17 debate on the bill forcing a federal review of the case.
Proffering references to medical textbooks and journals, Frist led his colleagues through to his conclusion. He argued that "a decision had been made to starve to death a woman based on a clinical exam that took place over a very short period of time by a neurologist who was called in to make the diagnosis rather than over a longer period of time." Dr. Frist, in other words, was offering a second opinion.
In an appearance yesterday on ABC's "Good Morning America," Frist insisted: "I raised the question, 'Is she in a persistent vegetative state or not?' I never made the diagnosis, never said that she was not."
Well, that depends on the meaning of "diagnosis." In the midst of his impressively detailed medical review, Frist declared flatly: "Terri's brother told me Terri laughs, smiles, and tries to speak. That doesn't sound like a woman in a persistent vegetative state."
So, Frist wanted to be seen as having the medical expertise to support his conclusion when doing so was convenient -- and now wants us to think he did nothing of the sort.
...Right-to-life politicians have done terrible damage to a serious cause. They claimed to know what they did not, and could not, know. They were willing to imply, without proof, terrible things about a husband who was getting in their way. Instead of making the hard and morally challenging case for keeping Terri Schiavo on life support, they spun an emotional narrative that they thought would play well on cable TV and talk radio.
But of course, they won't apologize. They won't admit they were wrong. Because these sort of people are the same ones who deny evolution, who stick their fingers in their eyes and denydenydeny facts.
I will say, it's refreshing to read that kind of cold outrage in mainstream media.
We are entitled to our moral, ethical and philosophical commitments. We are not entitled to our own facts.
...We should not "move on," as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist suggested. No, we cannot move on until those politicians who felt entitled to make up facts and toss around unwarranted conclusions about Schiavo's condition take responsibility for what they said -- and apologize.
...So the big-government conservatives had to invent a story. They had to insist that they knew, just knew, more about Terri Schiavo's condition than the doctors on the scene. They had to question Michael Schiavo's motives and imply that he wanted to, well, get rid of her.
"As I understand it," Frist said on the Senate floor, "Terri's husband will not divorce Terri and will not allow her parents to take care of her. Terri's husband, who I have not met, does have a girlfriend he lives with and they have children of their own." No accusation here, just a brisk walk through innuendo city.
Dr. Frist, as he likes to be known, didn't just make his case as a pro-lifer. He invoked his expertise as a member of the medical profession. "I close this evening speaking more as a physician than as a U.S. senator," Frist said during the March 17 debate on the bill forcing a federal review of the case.
Proffering references to medical textbooks and journals, Frist led his colleagues through to his conclusion. He argued that "a decision had been made to starve to death a woman based on a clinical exam that took place over a very short period of time by a neurologist who was called in to make the diagnosis rather than over a longer period of time." Dr. Frist, in other words, was offering a second opinion.
In an appearance yesterday on ABC's "Good Morning America," Frist insisted: "I raised the question, 'Is she in a persistent vegetative state or not?' I never made the diagnosis, never said that she was not."
Well, that depends on the meaning of "diagnosis." In the midst of his impressively detailed medical review, Frist declared flatly: "Terri's brother told me Terri laughs, smiles, and tries to speak. That doesn't sound like a woman in a persistent vegetative state."
So, Frist wanted to be seen as having the medical expertise to support his conclusion when doing so was convenient -- and now wants us to think he did nothing of the sort.
...Right-to-life politicians have done terrible damage to a serious cause. They claimed to know what they did not, and could not, know. They were willing to imply, without proof, terrible things about a husband who was getting in their way. Instead of making the hard and morally challenging case for keeping Terri Schiavo on life support, they spun an emotional narrative that they thought would play well on cable TV and talk radio.
But of course, they won't apologize. They won't admit they were wrong. Because these sort of people are the same ones who deny evolution, who stick their fingers in their eyes and denydenydeny facts.
I will say, it's refreshing to read that kind of cold outrage in mainstream media.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 05:06 pm (UTC)I thought this line was particularly interesting...
We should not "move on," as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist suggested.
...because yesterday, White House spokesman Scott McClellan, responding to questions raised by rep. John Conyers and other Democrats about the Downing Street Memos, said that Conyers "is simply trying to rehash old debates." After all, why should any of them be held accountable for things they've said or done? Who cares if Frist exploited a personal family tragedy to score political points, and was completely wrong? It's old news. Who cares if Bush lied to the public in order to push his policies through? Why get hung up on the past?
Anyway, according to this story, the Republicans have decided that the best defense is a good distraction.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 05:38 pm (UTC)http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/17/schiavo.governor.ap/index.html?section=cnn_latest
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:03 pm (UTC)Wow, he's really starved for distraction material, huh?
If he's so concerned about reaction time, maybe someone needs to refresh his memory as to how long it took him to do something regarding a couple of planes crashing into buildings in this country.
This administration infuriates me.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:21 pm (UTC)Truly unbelievable. I wonder how the Florida taxpayers feel about this misuse of public funds and resources for revenge?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:30 pm (UTC)My bad about pinning it on the wrong Bush, but seriously, could he get away with this crap if his brother weren't in office?
With each of these issues, the country gets more and more divided. I'm sick of this.