The Gaza pullout
Aug. 18th, 2005 10:14 amI've been meaning to write something about this recently, and Alex reminded me...
I am very pro-Israel. As I joke, I am "to the right of Sharon." Israel is the jewel of the Middle East--they have the highest literacy rate, they're the only democracy (until Iraq gets its shit together), they're a stablizing force in that cauldron of chaos. Plus, personally, I think Jewish culture is cool as shit.
With that in mind, I have two reactions to the Gaza pullout--emotional (ideological) and pragmatic. Ideologically I think the Jewish settlers should be able to stay there as long as we can enforce their right to stay, because that land was captured in a series of wars that the Arabs started and then lost and then whined about losing the land. Too bad, so sad--the lesson is, don't start wars based on the premise of wiping out Israel (which has always been the premise for any Arab-Israeli war--until the Egyptian peace accord, all Arab countries were unilaterally against Israel's right even to exist). Because Israel will find a way to kick your ass.
Now, pragmatically, I think the Gaza pullout is a good idea. As long as Arafat was alive, Israel and the Palestinians were in a death spiral--tit for tat, terrorist bombings were met with retaliation, egged on by Hamas (openly) and Arafat (less openly). Arafat paid only lip service to the peace process for a variety of reasons--I wonder why his whole psychology was based on Palestinian "liberation" since he wasn't really Palestinian himself but Egyptian. Now that Arafat is dead, I think the new Palestinian President, Abbas, may be able to do what Arafat would not--convince the Palestinians that peace is in their best interest. The Gaza pullout is part of this peace process--it's a gesture of good faith, because Gaza was part of the occupied territories that the Palestinians lost--but it also makes sense, because if Israel wants to remain a democracy, it needs to have a majority Israeli population, and Palestinians far outnumber Israelis in the occupied territories.
After the pullout, the next step is up to the Palestinians--if they can maintain control and keep Hamas (which openly declares its intent to destroy Israel--they are not shy about that) from destroying everything, the next step will probably be the West Bank, after which I guess the Palestinians have their own state, in effect. The two-state solution, which I think is best, although the West Bank is a LOT of land--I hope they don't pull out of all of that land. But it all depends on the willingness of the Palestinians to make this work--my brother and I have talked about the peculiar psychology of the Palestinian culture, and how they always cast themselves in the role of victims. Can they cast that aside and prove themselves worthy of statehood? I think they can. I think they'll see peace is in their best interest.
I am very pro-Israel. As I joke, I am "to the right of Sharon." Israel is the jewel of the Middle East--they have the highest literacy rate, they're the only democracy (until Iraq gets its shit together), they're a stablizing force in that cauldron of chaos. Plus, personally, I think Jewish culture is cool as shit.
With that in mind, I have two reactions to the Gaza pullout--emotional (ideological) and pragmatic. Ideologically I think the Jewish settlers should be able to stay there as long as we can enforce their right to stay, because that land was captured in a series of wars that the Arabs started and then lost and then whined about losing the land. Too bad, so sad--the lesson is, don't start wars based on the premise of wiping out Israel (which has always been the premise for any Arab-Israeli war--until the Egyptian peace accord, all Arab countries were unilaterally against Israel's right even to exist). Because Israel will find a way to kick your ass.
Now, pragmatically, I think the Gaza pullout is a good idea. As long as Arafat was alive, Israel and the Palestinians were in a death spiral--tit for tat, terrorist bombings were met with retaliation, egged on by Hamas (openly) and Arafat (less openly). Arafat paid only lip service to the peace process for a variety of reasons--I wonder why his whole psychology was based on Palestinian "liberation" since he wasn't really Palestinian himself but Egyptian. Now that Arafat is dead, I think the new Palestinian President, Abbas, may be able to do what Arafat would not--convince the Palestinians that peace is in their best interest. The Gaza pullout is part of this peace process--it's a gesture of good faith, because Gaza was part of the occupied territories that the Palestinians lost--but it also makes sense, because if Israel wants to remain a democracy, it needs to have a majority Israeli population, and Palestinians far outnumber Israelis in the occupied territories.
After the pullout, the next step is up to the Palestinians--if they can maintain control and keep Hamas (which openly declares its intent to destroy Israel--they are not shy about that) from destroying everything, the next step will probably be the West Bank, after which I guess the Palestinians have their own state, in effect. The two-state solution, which I think is best, although the West Bank is a LOT of land--I hope they don't pull out of all of that land. But it all depends on the willingness of the Palestinians to make this work--my brother and I have talked about the peculiar psychology of the Palestinian culture, and how they always cast themselves in the role of victims. Can they cast that aside and prove themselves worthy of statehood? I think they can. I think they'll see peace is in their best interest.