(no subject)

[ceebeegee]

Interesting. It would certainly explain a lot. Salon also looks at this theory.

Some of my favorite comments from that page:

If someone is feeding Bush things to say, they should be fired because he says some really stupid things!

and this exchange:

Oh, come on, guys. Bush gets that "deer in headlights" look because he's listening to messages from God, of course, and you know it.
___

Maybe Bush's handlers put the device in his ear and he THINKS it is the voice of God.

It just gets disturbing, though, when he argues with that voice during a debate.

I must say, I find all these references to Presidential bulges rather hilarious.

Comments

[minstrel70.livejournal.com]

Funny, I was just going to post about this myself. Frankly, I think it's grasping at straws, and I really hope it gets picked up by the mainstream media, because as these kinds of theories go, this one seems likely to blow up in its proponents' faces.

[mysticblaze.livejournal.com]

I must say, I find all these references to Presidential bulges rather hilarious.

Me too. :)

Why is it such a big deal that he might be hooked up? After all, he is not the greatest public speaker on the planet, nor is he able to think on his feet quickly. The bulge and earpiece can be a useful tool to remind him of salient points that he wants to make but forgets.

Think about how great it would be if you could have such earpieces on actors who forget their lines... No dead space...

[dje2004.livejournal.com]

Considering that Clinton was supposed to be a drug-kingpin who was responsible for dozens of deaths, this conspiracy theory seems pretty plausible in comparison.

I will say though, that the strongest evidence against it is that if someone was feeding Bush lines, you'd think he'd have come off much better in the first debate.