![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Interesting. It would certainly explain a lot. Salon also looks at this theory.
Some of my favorite comments from that page:
If someone is feeding Bush things to say, they should be fired because he says some really stupid things!
and this exchange:
Oh, come on, guys. Bush gets that "deer in headlights" look because he's listening to messages from God, of course, and you know it.
___
Maybe Bush's handlers put the device in his ear and he THINKS it is the voice of God.
It just gets disturbing, though, when he argues with that voice during a debate.
I must say, I find all these references to Presidential bulges rather hilarious.
Some of my favorite comments from that page:
If someone is feeding Bush things to say, they should be fired because he says some really stupid things!
and this exchange:
Oh, come on, guys. Bush gets that "deer in headlights" look because he's listening to messages from God, of course, and you know it.
___
Maybe Bush's handlers put the device in his ear and he THINKS it is the voice of God.
It just gets disturbing, though, when he argues with that voice during a debate.
I must say, I find all these references to Presidential bulges rather hilarious.
no subject
no subject
Me too. :)
Why is it such a big deal that he might be hooked up? After all, he is not the greatest public speaker on the planet, nor is he able to think on his feet quickly. The bulge and earpiece can be a useful tool to remind him of salient points that he wants to make but forgets.
Think about how great it would be if you could have such earpieces on actors who forget their lines... No dead space...
no subject
They're making a big deal of it in the blogosphere because it would violate the debate rules, and because it would ostensibly be proof of his supposed stupidity.
no subject
The bulge could have been something else... were there any rules that said that the participants to the debate could not have extra vocal reinforcement?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm all for correcting for subliminal influence and such but I must admire the reporter with the fortitude to take on this topic. It takes a lot of, well, balls.
(And the picture on the website doesn't have nearly the same impact as the one in the print article, which had a dotted box around Bush's...box.)
no subject
Actually there was something novel about this occasion, but it passed utterly below the radar. Discretion prevented anyone from mentioning that Bush's outfit gave him a very vivid basket. This was the first a time a president literally showed his balls. Check it out—your subconscious already has.
A lot of people root for Bush to make it as a man, and they're happy to see his big basket (even if it does suggest a male version of the push-up bra).
Fasten your crotch straps. With luck, we're in for a bumpy ride.
Hee hee...
no subject
no subject
no subject
I will say though, that the strongest evidence against it is that if someone was feeding Bush lines, you'd think he'd have come off much better in the first debate.
no subject