Ragtime vs. The Lion King
Proposition:
The Lion King definitely deserved the Tony for Best Musical that year, since (IMO) it was the better-directed, tighter, more theatrically overwhelming piece of musical theater. (When the audience started applauding during the "Circle of Life" number, I knew right then which show would win. That number works beautifully, I wept when I finally saw the show.)
However, Ragtime should've won the Pulitzer, since it's a great example of American playwriting and tells its story better (better score, better book) than TLK. (I have no idea what won the Pulitzer that year, just saying I think Ragtime should've gotten that award instead of the Tony).
Thoughts?
The Lion King definitely deserved the Tony for Best Musical that year, since (IMO) it was the better-directed, tighter, more theatrically overwhelming piece of musical theater. (When the audience started applauding during the "Circle of Life" number, I knew right then which show would win. That number works beautifully, I wept when I finally saw the show.)
However, Ragtime should've won the Pulitzer, since it's a great example of American playwriting and tells its story better (better score, better book) than TLK. (I have no idea what won the Pulitzer that year, just saying I think Ragtime should've gotten that award instead of the Tony).
Thoughts?
no subject
I think because it was an adaptation, it was less likely to be considered.
Doctorow himself has won two Pulitzers, for his novels Billy Bathgate and The March, but not for Ragtime.
no subject
Even more interesting, now that I think of it, because as great as South Pacific is (one of my favorite musicals, and I'm one of the few who likes the movie as well), can one really say it deals with American life? It takes place in the South Pacific, and several of the main characters are non-Americans.
no subject
no subject